| VERSUS AUTO SUPRA vs SUBARU, Mercedes vs Bmw, pilotul x vs pilotul y. Aceasta rubrica este dedicata provocarilor,analizelor,pariurilor(virtuale bineinteles),comparatiilor. Rog moderatorii sa fie foarte duri pe acest subiect. Fara OFF-TOPIC |
|
View Poll Results: AMG vs M vs RS
|
|
AMG
|
   
|
493 |
30.45% |
|
M
|
  
|
759 |
46.88% |
|
RS
|
  
|
367 |
22.67% |
14-04-10, 16:28
|
#1591
|
|
Virtual Tuner
 Stage 5
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,851
Member of:
[Design Team]
[PARTICIPANT CURSE]
[Virtual Tuning]
[Freehand Design Usergroup]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
ooh...sport rear differential....hmm, parca parca se contureaza ceva...  un Haldex Controller si aia e...
|
|
|
|
14-04-10, 17:32
|
#1592
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
|
|
|
|
|
14-04-10, 19:01
|
#1593
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,394
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNLORD
|
RS5 - ce!? e in clasa cu E si 5?
|
|
|
|
|
15-04-10, 15:46
|
#1594
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR
RS5 - ce!? e in clasa cu E si 5?
|
Ma refeream la data aparitiei in raport cu A5-ul ...
|
|
|
|
|
16-04-10, 15:54
|
#1595
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
We drive Audi's new RS5
Parerea lui Cris Harris:
"A BMW M3 is sharper, faster, far more interactive and – I have to assume - nothing like as relaxing to live with. The combination of S-Tronic and 4WD will really suit the UK market. The Mercedes C63 AMG is closer in concept and far more characterful, but on a damp road its driver would be all over the place following an RS5. Which actually sounds rather fun. The GT-R trounces the Audi for speed and dynamics but its interior is nothing like as appealing.
Anything else I need to know?
I’m going to say something a little controversial, but I was a touch disappointed with this car. It’s nothing like as characterful as the last RS4, and for all its technical brilliance it lacks roll-on performance – ironically just the type that the turbocharged S4 offers. It’s a fine car, but a long way from perfect."
|
|
|
|
|
16-04-10, 16:53
|
#1596
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,267
Member of:
[MERCEDES]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNLORD
We drive Audi's new RS5
Parerea lui Cris Harris:
"A BMW M3 is sharper, faster, far more interactive and – I have to assume - nothing like as relaxing to live with. The combination of S-Tronic and 4WD will really suit the UK market. The Mercedes C63 AMG is closer in concept and far more characterful, but on a damp road its driver would be all over the place following an RS5. Which actually sounds rather fun. The GT-R trounces the Audi for speed and dynamics but its interior is nothing like as appealing.
Anything else I need to know?
I’m going to say something a little controversial, but I was a touch disappointed with this car. It’s nothing like as characterful as the last RS4, and for all its technical brilliance it lacks roll-on performance – ironically just the type that the turbocharged S4 offers. It’s a fine car, but a long way from perfect."
|
Singurul avantaj in fata m3-ul la rs5 mi se pare aspectul, dar si asta se opreste la fake exhaust-urile din spate. Un s4 3.0 tfsi mi se pare o alegere mult mai buna, avand in vedere caracterul de GT.
O alta chestie ce mi sa parut interesanta:
Quote:
|
"The motor, which revs to 8500rpm, is nearly 30bhp more powerful than the RS4’s engine and yet produces just 252g/km of CO2 against the old car's 324g/km. A C63 puts out 319g/km"
|
M3 e92 : 290/263 g/km
E63 amg : 295 g/km
RS6 : 331 g/km
x5m : 325 g/km
S63 amg 5.5 biturbo : 246 g/km
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
16-04-10, 17:13
|
#1597
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,437
Member of:
[2 Roti]
[4Rally]
[BMW]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogdan_mb
Singurul avantaj in fata m3-ul la rs5 mi se pare aspectul, dar si asta se opreste la fake exhaust-urile din spate. Un s4 3.0 tfsi mi se pare o alegere mult mai buna, avand in vedere caracterul de GT.
O alta chestie ce mi sa parut interesanta:
M3 e92 : 290/263 g/km
E63 amg : 295 g/km
RS6 : 331 g/km
x5m : 325 g/km
S63 amg 5.5 biturbo : 246 g/km
|
si tu chiar crezi ca S63 o sa consume 10.5 l?  aceleasi noxe le va avea si viitorul M5
|
|
|
|
|
16-04-10, 19:38
|
#1598
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,267
Member of:
[MERCEDES]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Ai dat o replica demna de "bmw rulllzzz" Daca ai ceva concret te rog posteaza, in rest nu vad rostul sa bagi de vina fara argumente.
Ontopic :
"According to Kay Segler 20% lower CO2 emmisions and fuelconsumption than the curent BMW M5 E60
11,52 liter/100 km and 275,2 g/km
For reference BMW X5 M has 325 g/km but with alot of higher weight"
Last edited by Bogdan_mb; 16-04-10 at 19:42.
|
|
|
|
|
16-04-10, 19:49
|
#1599
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,437
Member of:
[2 Roti]
[4Rally]
[BMW]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogdan_mb
Ai dat o replica demna de "bmw rulllzzz" Daca ai ceva concret te rog posteaza, in rest nu vad rostul sa bagi de vina fara argumente.
Ontopic :
"According to Kay Segler 20% lower CO2 emmisions and fuelconsumption than the curent BMW M5 E60
11,52 liter/100 km and 275,2 g/km
For reference BMW X5 M has 325 g/km but with alot of higher weight"
|
Consumul mediu de combustibil se pare ca va fi de 10,8 l/100 kilometri. Viitorul model BMW M5 va accelera pana la 100 km/h in 4,4 secunde, iar viteza maxima va fi limitata electronic la 250 km/h
AMG anunta ca noul propulsor V8 bi-turbomarcheaza noi standarde vizavi de consumul de combustibil si eficienta. Consumul mediu anuntat pentru S 63 AMG este de 10,5 l/100 kilometri, cu 25% mai putin decat versiunea precedenta S63 AMG. Emisiile de CO2 au valoarea de 246 g/km, motorul indeplinind normele de poluare Euro 5.
ma refeream ca e cam greu de scos consumul ala mediu la un model M AMG RS..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
16-04-10, 19:57
|
#1600
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,556
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Un 3.0 diesel consuma atat daca te dai putin la el, sa fim seriosi. La fel si cu X5 3.0 diesel care are consum de 7%...ieri.
|
|
|
|
|
17-04-10, 16:42
|
#1601
|
 Stage 1
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 9
|
Re: AMG vs M vs RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkJEDI
????????? RS au motoare aspirate. respectiv rs4 are un v8 de 4.2 cu 420 cp. "abia face fata"? numai "specialisti" pe forumu asta.
|
Deci nu stiu cum sa`ti spun RS6 modele intre 2001 ...2005....au 2 turbine informeaza`te
|
|
|
|
|
05-05-10, 23:25
|
#1602
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
|
|
|
|
|
06-05-10, 08:34
|
#1603
|
|
2 Roti
Stage 5
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,101
Member of:
[2 Roti]
[PEUGEOT]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Deci Domnul X le cam da fum...
|
|
|
|
|
06-05-10, 11:25
|
#1604
|
Stage 1
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
EU ZIK K PRIMUL DIN STANGA L RUPE  )))))) CU AIA MICA
|
|
|
|
|
06-05-10, 13:58
|
#1605
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,556
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Cam stupida comparatia. In primul rand trebuia Cayenne Turbo S, nu Turbo modificat. In al doilea rand, trebuia X5 nu X6, stock, nu modificat. In al patrule rand, daca tot erau resoftate / modificate alea, ML-ul de ce era stock ? In al cincilea rand, chiar si stock toate, X5M este cel mai rapid (cea mai mica greutate + cea mai mare putere) dar diferenta nu e asa mare ca in film (de la 510CP la ML la 630CP la X6 sau cat avea...e o oarecare diferenta).
|
|
|
|
|
|
