| VERSUS AUTO SUPRA vs SUBARU, Mercedes vs Bmw, pilotul x vs pilotul y. Aceasta rubrica este dedicata provocarilor,analizelor,pariurilor(virtuale bineinteles),comparatiilor. Rog moderatorii sa fie foarte duri pe acest subiect. Fara OFF-TOPIC |
|
View Poll Results: AMG vs M vs RS
|
|
AMG
|
   
|
493 |
30.45% |
|
M
|
  
|
759 |
46.88% |
|
RS
|
  
|
367 |
22.67% |
17-11-11, 02:15
|
#2326
|
 Stage 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Din nou Tiff, protagonist ... :
|
|
|
|
19-11-11, 15:23
|
#2327
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,437
Member of:
[2 Roti]
[4Rally]
[BMW]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Deci chiar asa de performant sa fie noul M5?
From 0 to 62 mph (100 km/h), the F10 M5 stopped the clock at 4.1 seconds, and at 12.4 seconds, it already achieved 124 mph (200 km/h).
Same magazine reports that the M5 disappointing in the fuel consumption category. The average fuel consumption is said to be 13.1 mpg or 17.9 liters/100 km.
Deci sa o mai lase moale cu consumurile alea de SF de 9,9l si sa mai zica ca V10 consuma mult!!!In realitate diferentele alea dintre normele de consum ECU si consum real sunt enorme mai ales la modelele sport si la motoarele turbo pe benzina
http://www.bmwblog.com/2011/11/19/20...on-hockenheim/
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
19-11-11, 15:44
|
#2328
|
 Stage 5
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,889
Member of:
[Super Moderators]
[Moderators]
[REDACTOR 4TUNING]
[4TuningRO]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Noul BMW M5 este extrem de rapid. De exemplu, cei de la Car and Driver au reusit un 3.7 secunde pentru intervalul 0 - 96 km/h.
Last edited by boy_wonder; 19-11-11 at 15:47.
|
|
|
|
|
19-11-11, 15:46
|
#2329
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrian78bmw
Deci chiar asa de performant sa fie noul M5?
From 0 to 62 mph (100 km/h), the F10 M5 stopped the clock at 4.1 seconds, and at 12.4 seconds, it already achieved 124 mph (200 km/h).
Same magazine reports that the M5 disappointing in the fuel consumption category. The average fuel consumption is said to be 13.1 mpg or 17.9 liters/100 km.
Deci sa o mai lase moale cu consumurile alea de SF de 9,9l si sa mai zica ca V10 consuma mult!!!In realitate diferentele alea dintre normele de consum ECU si consum real sunt enorme mai ales la modelele sport si la motoarele turbo pe benzina
http://www.bmwblog.com/2011/11/19/20...on-hockenheim/ |
Nu stiu cine ar conduce "la consum" un M5 sau un RS6 etc ... nu de aia il iei si clar cifrele de la consum sunt de marketing si cam nerealiste 
Daca tot ai postat niste cifre, vin si eu cu timpul M5-ului pe Hockenheim: 1:12.90 ... [E60 M5 (1:16.06),Audi RS6 (1:15.30), Mercedes CLS 63 AMG with Performance Package (1:13.90), Panamera Turbo (1:13.70)]
|
|
|
|
|
19-11-11, 16:17
|
#2330
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,304
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Eu nu ii inteleg pe asa zisii jurnalisti auto, care la super cars contorizeaza consumul sau spatiul din portbagaj, nu mai zic de aberatiile cu emisii de co2 ca imi vine sa ii bat in dinti cu bata de cricket.
Deja cand citesc asa ceva, renunt sa mai citesc si restul, e clar ca sunt articole scrise de oligofreni si nu prezinta nici un interes.
__________________
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car.Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall.
Torque is how far you take the wall with you.
|
|
|
|
|
19-11-11, 16:19
|
#2331
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,437
Member of:
[2 Roti]
[4Rally]
[BMW]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by boy_wonder
Noul BMW M5 este extrem de rapid. De exemplu, cei de la Car and Driver au reusit un 3.7 secunde pentru intervalul 0 - 96 km/h.
|
Pai si vechiul M6 avea 0-60mph undeva la 4.1s fata de oficialul 4.6s
|
|
|
|
|
19-11-11, 17:57
|
#2332
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,556
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Adica scot 0.5 secunde in MINUS fata de timpul oficial, si asta la acceleratii 0-100 la 4-5 secunde ? Cel putin ciudat, le-a fost frica sa declare 4.2 timpul oficial ?
|
|
|
|
|
19-11-11, 18:57
|
#2333
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,437
Member of:
[2 Roti]
[4Rally]
[BMW]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Nu cred la M6 4.1sec e cu launch control dar se pare ca conteaza aceea mica diferenta 96-100km/h sau poate e ceva diferenta la vitezometre sau diferente de modele European vs American
Poate e cineva care se pricepe mai bine
EURO Models
343 PS (252 kW; 338 hp) @ 7900 rpm
Torque: 365 N·m (269 lb·ft) @ 4900 rpm
0-100 km/h (62 mph) — 5.1 s for Manual and SMG, 5.5 s for cabriolet
1/4 Mile — 13.3 s @ 104 mph (167.4 km/h)
Top Speed: 155 mph (249 km/h)(electronically limited); 191.38 mph (308.00 km/h) (delimited)
Skid Pad: 0.89g[11]
US Models
333 hp (248 kW; 338 PS)
Torque: 262 lb·ft (355 N·m)
0-100 km/h (62 mph) — 4.8 seconds for Manual and SMG, 5.6 seconds for cabriolet[12]
0–60 mph — 5.1 seconds for cabriolet as measured by Car and Driver magazine[13]
1/4 Mile – Coupe: 13.0 sec @ 104 mph (167 km/h),[14] Convertible: 13.7 sec @ 104 mph (167 km/h)
BMW M5 E60
0-100 km/h (62 mph): 4.7s [18]
(0-100 mph: 10.00, Road & Track [2/06])
(0-60 mph: 4.1s, Road & Track [2/06])
E90, E92, and E93 performance0–100 km/h 4.7 sec
0–60 mph 3.9 sec measured by Car and Driver magazine.[26] (2011 E92 w/ M-DCT trans)
|
|
|
|
|
20-11-11, 11:52
|
#2334
|
General Supervisor
Stage 5
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 17,791
Member of:
[Super Moderators]
[PARTICIPANT CURSE]
[BMW]
[MERCEDES]
[2 Roti]
[ALFA ROMEO]
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Originally Posted by a3ds
Eu nu ii inteleg pe asa zisii jurnalisti auto, care la super cars contorizeaza consumul sau spatiul din portbagaj, nu mai zic de aberatiile cu emisii de co2 ca imi vine sa ii bat in dinti cu bata de cricket.
Deja cand citesc asa ceva, renunt sa mai citesc si restul, e clar ca sunt articole scrise de oligofreni si nu prezinta nici un interes.
|
Sa nu uitam de spatiile de depozitare de la usa pasagerului si de cei 0,2 mm in plus la picioare pentru pasagerii din spate 
|
|
|
|
|
20-11-11, 12:16
|
#2335
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,304
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Mai ales bastardu' ala pompos de Clarkson&comp, nu ma mai uit la top gear de ani de zile, inainte vreme macar era funny, acum s-a sclerozat de tot, conduce masinile pe circuit ca pensionarii si are comentarii de gospodina la menopauza, a devenit gay show sold out. Au ajuns sa compare skoda cu mercedes si sa dea castigatoare skoda la calitatea materialelor, hai sictir.
|
|
|
|
|
20-11-11, 15:41
|
#2336
|
Stage 5
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 551
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
|
Mai ales bastardu' ala pompos de Clarkson&comp, nu ma mai uit la top gear de ani de zile, inainte vreme macar era funny, acum s-a sclerozat de tot, conduce masinile pe circuit ca pensionarii si are comentarii de gospodina la menopauza, a devenit gay show sold out. Au ajuns sa compare skoda cu mercedes si sa dea castigatoare skoda la calitatea materialelor, hai sictir.
|
Nu s au schimbat multe, eventual au trecut pe mai mult show, dar parerile in mod general sunt pe aceeasi lungime de unda ca in vechiul top gear, putin schimb la gusturi, atat. De exemplu prin 2000-2001 explica cum a3/a4/a8 sunt peste bmw mai putin seria 5, care nu avea cum sa l critice, mai ales atunci.Deci e38 si e46 au fost sub audi ? nu exista corectitudine 100%, doar cea care tinde spre majoritate, se pare ca nu mai faci parte din majoritate
__________________
The power within you...
|
|
|
|
|
29-11-11, 11:07
|
#2338
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-11, 23:54
|
#2339
|
Stage 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-11, 10:18
|
#2340
|
 Stage 4
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 285
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Deja de cand intrii pe site-ul pe care l-ai pus se vede castigatorul clar, se vede ca Bmw are un sprint foarte bun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
