![]() |
Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
2 Attachment(s)
Daca ati avea bani, care ati alege ? ( explicati de ce va place [estetic, intern, performanta ...])
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
sa o luam pe categorii .. design clar Ferrari, performante V12 aspirat vs v6 biturbo.. lol nu zic nimic :D , Comportament pe circuit ... iarasi nu mai zic nimic :P. F50- ul se apropie de perfectiune , o masinarie dusa la superlativ. Eu zic ca nu exista loc de comentarii la adresa F50. Jaguarul in schimb... e un supercar old school , motor de putere mare dopat, design superb, fara sisteme de siguranta, etc.. Am vazut o cursa intre o Zonda S sau F si un Jag din asta.. a maturat cu zonda in linie dreapta..
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
de ce nu ai facut poll?
oricum as alege F50 pt ca e ferrari si nu e jaguar...iar F50 e un model de legenda |
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
F50 fara discutie, cu toate ca si jaguarul e frumos nu are tente asa sportive ca ferrari.
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
Quote:
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
Daca ai un F50 devii automat un pasionat, colectionar, posesor al unei legende auto din toate timpurile ;) XJ220 cred ca e unul dintre cele m-ai tari jag-uri din toate timpurile, dar F50 e un concurent prea puternic pt el.
My 2 cents P.S. . mergea diablo si alte legende in comparatie |
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
prea puternic?:rolleyes2
Jaguar XJ 220:> Engine Specifications Engine Manufacturer Ford Engine Location Middle Engine Alignment Longitudinal Engine Construction aluminium alloy block & head Coolant Type Water Engine Type DOHC Number of Cylinders and Placement V-6 Valves per Cylinder 4 (toplam 24 adet) Engine Displacement 3498 cc (213.46 cu in) Bore 94 mm (3.7 in) Stroke 84 mm (3.31 in) Bore / Stroke Ratio 1.12 Unitary Capacity 583 cc/cylinder (35.58 cu in/cylinder) Number of Main Bearings 4 Compression Ratio 8.3 : 1 Fuel System Type Zytek fuel inj. Aspiration Type Turbo Compressor Type Intercooler Type 2 Air/Air Catalytic Converter Yes Maximum Engine Power 500 HP (372.8 kW) Maximum Engine Power rpm 7200 d/d Maximum Engine Torque 640 N.m (472.3 lb.ft , 65.3 kg.m) Maximum Engine Torque rpm 4500 d/d Engine Torque at Max. Engine Power rpm 494.5 N.m (7200 d/d) Power / Weight Ratio 320.5 HP/ton (239 W/kg) Power / Engine Displacement Ratio 142.9 HP/litre (106.6 kW/litre) CO2 Emissions Fuel Consumption Performance 0 - 80 km/h 0 - 60 mph 4 s 0 - 100 km/h 0 - 160 km/h 8 s 80 - 120 km/h (in top gear) 0 - 400 m Acceleration 0 - 1000 m Acceleration Top Speed 354 km/h (220 mph) Gearbox and Transmission Transmission Type 5M Top Gear Ratio 0.91 : 1 Final Drive Ratio 2.88 : 1 Drive Wheels RWD Handling, Suspension Geometry and Brakes Steering Type rack & pinion Steering Turns (lock to lock) Turning Circle Diameter Suspension (front) I.W.CS.ARB. Suspension (rear) I.W.CS.ARB. Brakes (front/rear) VeDi/VeDi-S Brake Disc Diameter (front) 330 mm Brake Disc Diameter (rear) 304 mm Wheels (front) 9 x 17 Wheels (rear) 14 x 18 Tyres (front) 255/45 17 Tyres (rear) 345/35 18 Ferrari F50:> Engine Specifications Engine Manufacturer Ferrari Engine Location Middle Engine Alignment Longitudinal Engine Construction iron block & aluminium head Coolant Type Water Engine Type DOHC Number of Cylinders and Placement V-12 Valves per Cylinder 5 (toplam 60 adet) Engine Displacement 4698 cc (286.69 cu in) Bore 85 mm (3.35 in) Stroke 69 mm (2.72 in) Bore / Stroke Ratio 1.23 Unitary Capacity 391.5 cc/cylinder (23.89 cu in/cylinder) Number of Main Bearings Compression Ratio 11.3 : 1 Fuel System Type Bo Motronic 2.7 fuel inj. Aspiration Type Normal Compressor Type - Intercooler Type None Catalytic Converter Yes Maximum Engine Power 513 HP (382.5 kW) Maximum Engine Power rpm 8000 d/d Maximum Engine Torque 470 N.m (346.9 lb.ft , 47.9 kg.m) Maximum Engine Torque rpm 6500 d/d Engine Torque at Max. Engine Power rpm 456.6 N.m (8000 d/d) Power / Weight Ratio 417.1 HP/ton (311 W/kg) Power / Engine Displacement Ratio 109.2 HP/litre (81.4 kW/litre) CO2 Emissions Fuel Consumption Performance 0 - 80 km/h 0 - 60 mph 0 - 100 km/h 3.7 s 0 - 160 km/h 8.5 s 80 - 120 km/h (in top gear) 0 - 400 m Acceleration 12.1 s @ 200 km/h (124.5 mph) 0 - 1000 m Acceleration 21.7 s Top Speed 325 km/h (202 mph) Gearbox and Transmission Transmission Type 6M Top Gear Ratio 0.9 : 1 Final Drive Ratio 3.7 : 1 Drive Wheels RWD Handling, Suspension Geometry and Brakes Steering Type rack & pinion Steering Turns (lock to lock) 3.3 Turning Circle Diameter 12.6 m (41.3 ft) Suspension (front) I.DW.CS. Suspension (rear) I.DW.CS. Brakes (front/rear) VeDi/VeDi-S Brake Disc Diameter (front) 356 mm Brake Disc Diameter (rear) 335 mm Wheels (front) 8.5 x 18 Wheels (rear) 13.0 x 18 Tyres (front) Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-Fiorano P245/35 ZR 18 Tyres (rear) Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-Fiorano P335/30 ZR 18 Orikum prefer F 50 |
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
prea tare , nu din perspectiva 0-100 sau top speed, ci de aspectul legendei care va ramane intotdeauna F50
Oricum daca le compari doar 0-100 , F40 atinge suta in 3,2 secunde ;) Un alt aspect foarte important la categoria asta de masini : Jaguar XJ220 : Power / Weight Ratio 320.5 HP/ton (239 W/kg) Ferrari F50 : Power / Weight Ratio 417.1 HP/ton (311 W/kg) |
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
aaa..da..k istorie desigur F50 e o legenda ;)
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
F50 nu e genul de masina cu care sa rulezi altundeva decat pe o pista de curse (care dupa cum stim nu exista), a fost si a ramas un show-car, pe care nimeni nu-si permite sa-l riste, orice zgarietura/tamponare in trafic fiin o catastrofa.
~Nautilus |
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
Nu prea are logica aceasta comparatie, Jag-ul XJ 220 e o masina din epoca Ferrari F40, nu F50.Pe vremea aceea sistemele de siguranta nu erau atat de importante si nici motoarele in V de capacitate cilindrica relativ "mica" supraalimentate nu erau o rusine. As alege Jaguarul,e un alt gen de masina.
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
F50 (la naiba, urasc ferrari mai putin F50). Jag-u' arata cam prea Racing pentru mine.
P.S. Unde gasesc specsuri? dati-mi un link pls |
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
uite aici: http://www.worldofmotorsports.com/
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
ferrari tot ferrari ramane ...
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
ceva timp de acum in colo nu o sa fie multe masini sa se apropie macar de un f50 ...
|
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
Quote:
F50 a fost o dream-car legendara pentru multi dintre noi si poate de aceea o consideram asa de tare, este facuta pentru pista jaguarul in schimb.. cred k rupe .. o sa ma injure lumea,dar unde mergi cu ferrari-ul? jaguarul merge si pe sosea si pe pista fara probl.. si ferrari ar putea..dar a spus si cineva mai sus.. cine se risca cu ferrari-ul ? doar seicul ala are de toate si se plimba cu ele doar pe sosele de la el din tara, si sunt sigur k nu se plimba de nebun si are si el un antemergator.. deci aleg jaguarul cu capul si ferrari-ul cu sufletul.. ca sa fiu mai clar.. ferrari-ul l-as conduce , jaguarul l-as pastra |
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
Quote:
btw am vazut un xj220 pe stirbei voda si am ramas tampit sa vad asa ceva pe strazile de cacat din bucuresti! |
Re: Jaguar XJ220 vs. Ferrari F50
o leganda ramane tot o legenda ferrari f ... si atat
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:13. |
- Copyright 2026 4Tuning