|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
@unlord
Dublu ambreiaj |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Banuiam si eu, au pus si pe A45 AMG cu dublu, dar si acolo existau niste glitchuri, transmisia fiind mai putin performanta decat rivalele DSG, DCT si PDK, in sensul ca nu e prea intuitiva, mai ales cand esti pe circuit.
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/rm4_fqDge1o?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
<iframe width="940" height="559" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/BuYet6Psh6M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Randy's Take: On handling: It is a good-old powerful front-engine, rear-drive car in the M3 tradition, and it is capable of doing slight power oversteers off the corners, which is something I really enjoy, something I really like. So I found I could balance the car on exit to do that little power oversteer. And it has a little bit of entry understeer. On braking: The brakes stuck with me. They took a fair amount of effort, but the braking keeps the car from wanting to turn. But in general it doesn't want to -- it's not real anxious to turn. On the engine: It's got a lot of torque. And it's funny: It's an inline-six turbo, but it kind of sounds like a V-8. Inside the car, anyway. The power's good. It's a little lazy as you get near the redline. (Power falls off) a little bit, but it's super torque-y in the middle of the corner. It pulls strong after the shift. Overall: You can drift the car now, and it's one of the things I liked about M3s all along -- front engine, rear drive, power oversteer drifter. And this car is back. It's an improvement over the E92, big improvement over a stock E92 in my opinion. Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/features/p...#ixzz3E4LzXZmB |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/6zIWfZ3RaGM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Bmw M3 vs. AUdi R8 V8. Nu prea ai ce sa ii mai faci unui motor turbo de putere echivalenta chiar si cu motorul amplasat central, destul de mare diferenta.
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Y9AFQkmkLOk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Si vechiul m3 se ducea considrabil mai bine decat r8ul.
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
De la Sport-Auto: Audi RS6 vs Mercedes E63 AMG S
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Masuratori C&D pt M4: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review
Zero to 60 mph: 3.7 sec Zero to 100 mph: 8.5 secc Zero to 130 mph: 14.5 sec Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 4.7 sec Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.2 sec Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.7 sec Standing ¼-mile: 12.0 sec @ 119 mph Top speed (governor limited): 163 mph Braking, 70-0 mph: 150 ft Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.00 g P.s. Eu estimez ca C63 AMG S o sa fie sigur mai rapid in linie dreapta, poate chiar si ala standard. |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/rJjAaHtHYMc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POQ7DO-mfVA |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
din titlu pare ca RS7 avea racing fuel cat si tot interiorul scos.
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
2015 F80 M3 runs 11.66 @ 119.24 mph quarter mile (stock, DCT, 103 octane)
<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/VUTqbhh2DCc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:45. |
- Copyright 2026 4Tuning