Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/5JYxmZAjpug?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

A.m.s. pretinde un scor de 7.50 min pe Nurburgring pt M3/M4.

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

De la C&D, test cu masuratori pt: Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG 4Matic

Highs:

Potent 577-hp V-8,
judo back-road moves,
mobile hot-stone massage,
Wagner on Burmester.

Lows:

Hyperactive attention assist,
no head-up display,
lurchy auto trans,
the self-steering part of the
dynamic cruise control.

Zero to 60 mph: 3.8 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 8.8 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 14.7 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 4.9 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.6 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.2 sec @ 118 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 187 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 155 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad*: 0.93 g

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

<iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/mpxa6M97zEA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

zvonul asta e vechi.
acum au pus motorul si pe sasiu:

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/...t-drive-review

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

TARE, foarte TARE!

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

avantajul acestei solutii fata de x50d de la bmw consta in mai multe: o turbina in minus care da o greutate mai mica a motorului...192 kg pariez ca inseamna cel putin 20-30 kg in minus fata de motorul x50d, fiabilitate mai mare, temperatura mai mica in compartimentul motor, motor mai compact care permite instalarea pe masini mici de genul A4 sau A5...ceea ce nu este posibil pt seria 3 si 4 cu x50d si in ultimul rand zero lag.

cuplul de 750 este atins de la 1250 ture, practic de cand ai bagat cheia in contact, la bmw avand cuplul maxim de 740 abia la 2000 ture.

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/WdzKJ1DwG20?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

Un scan din Sport-Auto cu Bmw M4 (Michelin Pilot Supersport + ceramic brakes + DCT):

0-100km/h 4.2 sec
0-160kmh 8.8 sec
0-200kmh 13.7 sec

Nurburgring: 07.52 min.

Porsche 911 Carrera S: 07:44 min
Bmw M3 GTS: 07:48 min
Bmw M3 CSL E46: 07:50 min
Mercedes SL65 AMG Black Series: 07:51 min
Bmw M4 Coupe: 07.52 min
BMW M5: 07:55 min
Audi RS5 Coupe: 07.59 min
Mercedes C63 Amg PP: 08.01 min
Bmw M3 E92: 08:05 min
Alpina B3 Biturbo: 08:14 min


Hockenheim: 01.12,18 min

Bmw M4 Coupe: 01.12,18 min
Bmw M5: 01.13,4 min
Mercedes C63 Amg PP: 01.13.6 min
Audi RS5 Coupe: 01.14.3 min
Bmw M3 E92: 01.14.3 min
Alpina B3 Biturbo: 01.15.3 min

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

De la Autobild: Audi S8 vs. Mercedes S63 AMG vs. Porsche Panamera Turbo. S8-ul e cel mai bun deal,e f. mare diferenta de pret intre S8 si celelalte modele, si f. mica la performante. Pretul Porscheului e de porc, de design nu mai comentez, e si cel mai lent, si nu stiu ce cauta in clasa asta, cand ar trebui sa se bata cu M5, RS6 and E63 AMG. Macar la Mercedes ai scuza ca platesti pt lux, spatiu si performanate.

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

Smeker motorul, pe C63 o sa faca legea in clasa medie la acceleratii si reprize.
<iframe width="580" height="438" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/jHAaVrR4LZs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

Parca si la bmw se vorbeste de un 770 cu un nou motor v8 4.0

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

nu stiu daca motorul va fi suficient de puternic pt Mercedes AMG-GT.
nu ar fi trebuit ceva mai sanatos?

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

Eu ma refer la C-Classe, e acelasi motor, putin detunat probabil si fara diferential pt varianta normala si cu 510 hp in anumite editii speciale (actualul C-Clase E63 507 Coupe).

Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
 

Pe dyno motorul 3.0 de pe Bmw M3/M4 scoate 465cp si 577Nm