|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
3300 lbs / 1497 kg (all fluids, 90% fuel, no driver) 3466 lbs / 1572 kg / (plus 68kg driver and 7kg luggage) M4 is 80kg (176 pounds) lighter than E92 M3 coupe, when comparably equipped M4 is 23kg (50 pounds) lighter than F80 M3 sedan Detalii si informatii complete (cu multe poze interesante), aici: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=923203 P.s. Ce ma bucura e ca M3-ul arata mai bine ca M4 ! :) |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Ai tu dreptate insa, daca ar reusi sa imprumute din frumusetea diferita a italiencelor, ar fi superbe intr-adevar... |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Audi RS7 vs. BMW M5 vs. Mercedes E 63 AMG S
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/v...72.html?show=2 http://www.dragtimes.ru/en/blogs/view/142 |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Masuratori de la Car & Driver pt Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG S-Model Wagon. Not Baaad!
Zero to 60 mph: 3.4 sec Zero to 100 mph: 8.0 sec Zero to 130 mph: 13.4 sec Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 4.1 sec Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.5 sec Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.7 sec Standing ¼-mile: 11.7 sec @ 122 mph Top speed (governor limited): 174 mph Braking, 70-0 mph: 153 ft Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.97 g |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Gbcj-zE7gBw?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
Nu mai stiu astia ce sa mai faca, ridica orice Ford in slavi. |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Cateva detalii noi despre viitorul M3/M4:
■ F80 M3 / F82 M4 are more than 10 seconds faster around the Nurburgring than the E90/E92 M3. ■ The M3/M4 were more or less built and developed around the steering. This electric power steering system (EPS) is the best that money can buy today. Our benchmark was to beat the current M3 in terms of steering feedback and we beat it (and there's not much out there that can claim to beat the current M3 when it comes to steering feedback and precision). The steering is very much an enjoyable part of the car and you will be able to enjoy it not just on the Nurburgring, but also just going to the office everyday. ■ Reported DIN weight is with standard brakes (not carbon ceramics). ■ Carbon ceramic brakes save 6-7kg (13.2lbs - 15.4lbs) overall. Not as much weight saved as on the F10 M5 with ceramic brakes, but that's because the caliper upgrade is much bigger than in the M5's situation. Here, we're seeing the calipers go from 4 piston front / 2 piston rear on the standard M3/M4 brakes to the 6 piston front / 4 piston rear calipers on the M Carbon Ceramic Brakes. ■ Automatic rev matching on the manual transmission is disabled in Sport+ mode. It's active in the Sport and Comfort modes. ■ Center of gravity is pretty much the same between the M3 and M4, but not identical since the two cars have different shock absorber settings. Both are a little lower than the 3/4 Series. ■ M3 naturally has an aerodynamically better shape than the M4 (if the M4 did not have its gurney integrated trunk) due to the M4's less steep and longer roof. The gurney flap integrated into the M4 trunk spoiler helps the M4 catch up aerodynamically. ■ New trunk lid removes 5kg (11 lbs) from the car instead of active rear spoilers which would have added weight to the car. ■ Manual transmission is a further developed gearbox from the 1M Coupe, with twin blade clutch, updated oil system and coating within the gearbox to take the higher load of the S55 engine. It's also lighter by more than 12kg (26.5 lbs) compared to manual gearbox in E90 M3. ■ Manual transmission gearbox saves 55 pounds in the US curb weight (compared to DCT). ■ Rear seats are 5kg (11 lbs) lighter than regular 3 or 4 Series. ■ Engine crankshaft is about 3kg (6.6 lbs) lighter than typical BMW inline 6 engine, but 20% stiffer. ■ Crankcase housing is 2.8kg (6.2 lbs) lighter. No steel liners. Unique aluminum alloy plasmacoated with steel plasma, which reduces friction levels. This technology was used on the M3 GTS with its upgraded 4.4L 450hp engine. ■ Car's components are engineered to withstand up to 1.4g braking force and more than 1.2g of lateral acceleration. |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
150. BMW M3 E9* - 8:05.00 Adica s-ar bate cu astea: 107. Subaru Impreza WRX STi 7:54.15 156 '07 308 / 1480 AndreaDg1989 108. Porsche Cayman S 7:55.00 156 '13 325 / 1320 Walter Rohrl Pai sa ne uitam la asta: 95. BMW M3 CSL (E46) 7:50.00 158 '03 360 / 1385!!! |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
2014 Audi RS7 vs 2014 Porsche Panamera Turbo! - Head 2 Head
RS7 - "a lot of understeer" - se pare ca nu au scapat de de urata problema! <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/O3ZgPaJWw-U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
anormal ar fi sa nu apara understeer :))
R8 si parca TT-S sau TT-RS sunt singurele exceptii |
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
Quote:
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/7-yCupxxErM?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
De la Motortrend: Audi RS7 vs. Mercedes-Benz CLS63 AMG S vs. Porsche Panamera Turbo
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
de la SportAuto.de: Audi RS4 vs. Bmw Alpina B3 Xdrive.
|
Re: AMG vs. M vs. RS
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/lJsHN3f6Ibc?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:33. |
- Copyright 2026 4Tuning