BMW M5 vs Alpina B5 vs Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG vs Brabus E V12

[OPC-UL]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQeOy...elated&search=

M5

Type: V10
Displacement cu in (cc): 301 (4941)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 500(373) / 7750
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 383(520) / 6100
Redline at RPM: 8250
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 255/40 ZR19 - 285/35 ZR19
Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 191.1 × 72.7 × 75.8
Weight lb (kg): 4012 (1821)
Performance
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.5
Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250) - electronically limited
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): 12/18 (n.a.)
Base Price: 2007 BMW M5 - $82,500 / 86,200 € (last update: 2/20/2007)

ALPINA B5

Type: V10
Displacement cu in (cc): 301 (4941)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 500(373) / 7750
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 383(520) / 6100
Redline at RPM: 8250
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 255/40 ZR19 - 285/35 ZR19
Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 191.1 × 72.7 × 75.8
Weight lb (kg): 4012 (1821)
Performance
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.5
Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250) - electronically limited
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): 12/18 (n.a.)


Base Price: 2007 BMW M5 - $82,500 / 86,200 € (last update: 2/20/2007)

MERCEDES-BENZ E55 AMG

Standard Engine6.2L V8Standard Transmission7 Speed AutomaticCylinders8********** @ RPM507@6800Fuel Economy Cty/Hwy14 / 20Combined Fuel Economy16EPA ClassMid-SizeNumber of Valves32Torque @ RPM465@5200 (foot-lbs)Fuel Type/SystemGas Engine / Sequential Electronic Fuel InjectedTurbo (yes/no)NoOverdrive TransmissionYesBattery OutputN/ACompression11.3Displacement6208 / 379Bore X Stroke4.02x3.72Cruising Range337.6Final Drive Gear Ratio OptN/APower To Weight Ratio8.3Final Drive Ratio2.82Valves ConfigurationDual Overhead Cam/Twin Overhead CamSuperchargedNoElectric ********** RPMN/AElectric Torque Feet Per PoundN/A (foot-lbs)Electric Torque RPMN/A (foot-lbs)Electric ********** BHPN/A

Brabus E V12

Engine
Type: V12, Biturbo
Displacement cu in (cc): 384 (6300)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 640(471) / 5100
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 757(1026) / 1750
Redline at RPM: n.a.
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 255/35 ZR19 - 285/30 ZR19
Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 187.9 × 71.1 × n.a.
Weight lb (kg): n.a.
Performance
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.5
Top Speed mph (km/h): 217.6 (350.2)
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a.


Base Price: 2005 Mercedes-Benz Brabus E V12 Biturbo - $355,000 / 298,000 € (last update: 2/20/2007)

[BAMBAKE]

votaez brabus E V12 mi se pare ca arata cel mai bine si este si cea mai rapida.

[mph/km/h]

brabusul nu este depasit de nimeni>inca!

vot brabus E!

[law53]

brabus E e cea mai performanta, cea mai brutala, dar si cea mai sumpa

[TURBOSS]

m5 vs b5 >casiga b5
b5 vs brabus E > brabus E
e55 amg vs brabus E > castiga brabus E

brabusul ajuta mercedesul sa fie mereu deasupra bmw!
daca nu era brabus-ul ar fii ramas mercedes>pt lux si bmw> pt vit.
de aia sunt asa de puntine brabus, pt ca sunt f scumpe.

[unchiulNOS]

brabus-ul nu este depasit inca si cred ca nu va fii depasit!
sunt mereu cu un pas inainte.

cls-rocket...ultima "inventie" scoasa de cei de la brabus.

[crissti_d]

sincer cred ca Brabus E V12 nu prea are ce cauta in vs asta.
face parte din alta clasa de putere si in special in cu totul alta clasa de pret.
decat un Brabus E V12 mai bine un m5 si un e55 amg si restul de bani benzina.)

[Bogdan_mb]

Daca alegi strict dupa date Brabus, e castigator detasat. Dar realitatea poate fi alta.

Uite aici un mic clip , un M6 stock (acelasi motor ca si M5 doar cateva kg bune in plus) si un Kleeman K4 , tot 640 de cai.

http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...9b00fcca49.htm

Comentariul oficial de la Kleeman:

The race between the E55 and the M6 is the result of:

5 speed auto box vs. - 7 speed F1-gear box =

·more opportunities to stay in peak power rev range
·much faster up-shift times

The superfast gear shift and many gears give the M6 its major advantage. We also saw how the M-cars were able to give the Gallardo and 997 Turbo with manual shift a run for their money.


Other possible factors:
·Vehicle mass (1650 vs 1750 kg)(at least at lower speeds)
·8,000 rpm redline vs 6300 rpm redline

[RazvanC4]

Eu as alege doar M5! Ganditiva pe circuit daca restul masinilor din versus ii fac fatza! eu cred ca nu! Si mai e si aspectul pret ce inclina balanta tot spre M5

[Bogdan_mb]

Originally Posted by RazvanC4

Eu as alege doar M5! Ganditiva pe circuit daca restul masinilor din versus ii fac fatza! eu cred ca nu! Si mai e si aspectul pret ce inclina balanta tot spre M5

M5 intradevar e peste un E55 pe circuit, dar nu stiu insa cum face fata la noul E 63 AMG

[Silviu_Mpower]

pana aflam dak va face fata ,,noului E63 amg'' M5 ramane bo$$-ul

[FIGHET]

parerile sunt impartite ce s a zic se inclina balanyta rau de tot

[Bogdan_mb]

AMG-ul e un "daily car" iar M5-ul un "weekend car"...

[NOScox]

trebuia facut un pool!

brabus-ul este cel mai performant, exteriorul isi arata agresivitatea fara de egal!

[snookye]

tot respectul pt bmw...dar motorul biturbo mananca asfaltul si ce mai e pe langa